A team agreement includes two or more companies that combine resources to provide a government mission. Typically, it is a large company and one or more small businesses, the large group being the main contractor in government and the smallest and subcontractor for the prime contractor. The greatest risk of these agreements is that, once the agreement is reached, the smallest company will not receive the expected share of work if the project offer is awarded. It is therefore important that the team agreement specify whether the principal contractor intends to sub-order the potential subcontractor if the principal contractor obtains the contract in question. The agreement should also cover, among other things, the protection of the protected data concerned. The two companies have begun negotiations for subcontracting, with FCi offering only a 22% share of work. They never agreed on a definitive subcontracting, and FCi ended their relationship. CGI sued FCi in Fairfax County, Virginia, Circuit Short, for violating the revised team agreement, unjust enrichment and fraudulent inducements. A jury awarded CGI $3.5 million for breach of contract and $8.5 million for the loss of fraudulent incentives, but the judge struck down both awards and awarded FCi a summary decision on the unjust enrichment application. The terms of the CGI-FCi team agreement, as reported by the court, are fairly typical.
For example, it is customary for two contractors to agree to jointly develop a proposal, to outline a post-assignment volume of work and a share of work, and to agree that they negotiate a “good faith” subcontract at the time of award. As the CGI Federal case shows, these common notions can be an almost impenetrable network of barriers to the success of outsourcing. The CGI Federal case confirms that potential subcontractors should negotiate the essential subcontract terms with the team contract and minimize all subcontracting conditions. A team agreement is an agreement between companies to pool resources to obtain and execute a government mandate. They generally exist between a company competing with a high-level contract and a potential subcontractor or joint venture. Team agreements generally focus on the tasks of preparing the proposal, the distribution of work after allocation, the exclusivity of the team agreement and the conditions of subcontracting in case of subcontracting. A subcontract is a legally binding agreement that defines the work to be done, the pricing, the delivery requirements, the expiry clauses and the procedures for resolving subcontracting disputes. Prior to this case, it was established that an “agreement of agreement” was not applicable, at least under Virginia law. While the jury found that FCi misled CGI, the CFI`s decision to confirm the amended team agreement resulted in CGI`s right to obtain a draw for fraud or unjust enrichment. Like any business relationship, you should know what you are getting into.
Protecting your company`s interests is a top priority. Although not exhaustive, there are some drawbacks here of team agreements: a team agreement is a kind of team agreement that consists of a senior contractor and another company that acts as a subcontractor. The two meet to follow the orders of the government. Thanks to team agreements, companies are better positioned when awarding contracts. This type of agreement can work particularly well for small businesses that want access to contracts they cannot get on their own. In 2012, CGI signed a cooperation agreement with FCi to jointly develop a contract proposal from the Department of Foreign Affairs for which FCi would be the main contractor and CGI as a subcontractor. FCi retained the exclusive rights to finalize the proposal and negotiate with the government any major contracts that would result. In today`s competitive construction industry, companies choose to engage in external parts.