An axiom is a truth nobody can prove. For example, everyone knows that one equals one, but there is no formal proof. However, when one tries to do arithmetic by ignoring that axiom and, say, letting one equal two, then very quickly the math descends into chaos and absurdity. There is no getting around an axiom, even though one cannot prove it.
A similar principle applies to the social sciences. It was an accepted axiom of society that men are men and women are women. No longer. That axiom has been rejected by some elements of society, and the absurd consequences are becoming more apparent all the time.
The late Betty Friedan, a so-called pioneer of the radical feminist movement, once said the only difference between men and women is biological “packaging” – that is to say superficial appearance. It would follow that by changing one’s external appearance, one can change his sex. Liberals accept this as an axiom.
Science clearly refutes this, but radical leftists, and even some conservatives on the more libertarian side, manage to ignore the science, despite growing evidence that the transgender doctrine is harmful to individuals and to society in general.
The science says maleness and femaleness are the two necessary and complementary halves of the human species. They have different functions that serve each other. Morally speaking, the sexes are equal but not equivalent, and that seems to be a point of major confusion to liberals.
To them, equality means interchangeability. For example, because the races are equal, one can, without analyzing the situation, exchange a white driver for a black driver with zero effect. The races are not a biological absolute.
But the sexes are. Because they are complementary, one cannot exchange a mother for a father. Indeed, there are many social functions in which the sexes are not automatically interchangeable – for example, physically arduous sports and certain physically demanding occupations involving police work and soldiering. Even in occupations in which physical strength is irrelevant, women tend to have different preferences from men’s. For evidence, attend any officially sanctioned chess tournament, where gender is considered irrelevant, and one cannot help but notice the predomination of men over women, despite sincere outreach attempts by the U.S. Chess Federation.
Trying to force the facts to accommodate ideology has resulted in attempts to place women into occupations that only in feminist mythology can women serve as well as men. Army Special Forces is one. The Army can graduate women in its special forces training program but only by carefully lowering the standards, while maintaining the fiction that they are not doing so. Carried to its extreme, Special Forces will eventually consist of equal numbers of men and women. In combat, this will predictably result in catastrophe and defeat.
The absurdities are even more glaring than that. Consider the case of Mack Beggs. She is a girl who is undergoing procedures to make her appear to be a man. In a high school wrestling competition, the testosterone injections Beggs is receiving make her vastly stronger than the other girls, and as a result, Beggs is crushing the competition – indeed, there is no effective competition. These results help Beggs to outcompete her opponents for a college athletic scholarship.
On perhaps a more sinister note, the morality or immorality of transgenderism is no longer considered a matter of personal opinion. Now it is a matter of enforced law. In California and New York, one can be fined or jailed for refusing to address someone by the gender title he prefers, regardless of his actual sex.
This amounts to a moral standard imposed by the government, which runs roughshod over the First Amendment. There is, despite the separation doctrine, a state religion: the religion of radical leftist mythology.
Eventually, this could result in something Title IX was designed to prevent: the domination of collegiate sports by men, since the logical conclusion of all this will be to permit men to join women’s teams. Again, the absurdities multiply.
Trying to make one equal two makes arithmetic unworkable. Pretending manhood equals womanhood will make society unworkable.
“A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God.”
Do you have a list of different garments for male and female? Does this include accessories or just the items that cover us? You see I have this lovely tunic, but I’m sure I’ve seen a pic of Jesus in some thing similar!
27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus
Any questions, I see this as we are human we all have our strengths and weaknesses. And as long as our love is true I don’t think god cares if we call ourselves male, female or elephants as long as he can see we are true to ourselves
Anyone who discusses sex with primary school children is a pedophile and should be prosecuted and barred from contact with children in the future.
Schools that seek to sexualise children should be shut down.
Really!! The only reason I could see anyone saying this is so they could groom children.
Primary school children should be taught age appropriate sex ed’ , ie.
5-6 family groups and dinamics about people having private parts that no one else should touch!
8-10 The biology of the human reproductive system. Some children (normal for some of the girls) will start puberty before leaving primary school.
sadly not every gardian is happy to discuss this issue. My great aunt (who’s mother died when she was young) thought you could get pregnant from kissing a man. You can imagine her shock on her wedding night!
No don’t go around showing kids porn. This is a illegal. But talk about the reason humans have sex and discuss why we have age restrictions.
This is what gets me, why are people such cowards that they would allow the abuse of their children rather than speak up?
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
“Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor *effeminate men*, nor sodomites, nor the greedy, nor thieves, nor drunkards, nor slanderers, nor swindlers, will inherit the Kingdom of God.”
That’s not what it says? And from the real passage I’m guessing lesbians or ok.
So by changing the first paragraph to fit your needs are you not committing two of the sins in the second?
Ps Some ‘effeminate’ men are straight.
I’m interested in learning more as a devote Christian and also as I am seriously interested in creating a nationally distributed Christian Political Outreach documentary, as Clearly the moral platform of all existing parties aren t the Godly fit b for any True God Focused American,and we are entering the beginning,in my humble opinion of the last days!!!!!
That’s because people stopped voting for strongly religious party’s! Maybe because this would not allow for a fair equal society. E.g., not allowing people to dress as they wish.
I am looking forward to returning with Jesus astride my own magnificient white stallion, as I observe him obliterating the evil hoardes before Him. Glory hallelujah!
Pingback: The Method to Their Madness – Dr. Rich Swier
Pingback: The Method to Their Madness | The United West
Pingback: The Method to Their Madness | NoisyRoom.net
Pingback: The Method To Their Madness – Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog
Pingback: Schools as battlegrounds for liberty - Conservative News and Views